This is an outdated version published on 2021-07-25. Read the most recent version.

Ergonomics and Forensic Engineering

Authors

  • George Samaras Samaras & Associates, Inc. https://orcid.org/
  • EA Samaras

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51501/jotnafe.v38i1.102

Keywords:

human factors, ergonomics, rubric, forensic engineering, user error

Abstract

In disputes, forensic engineers routinely investigate available hardware and software and may examine other engineering attributes and activities. Human factors and ergonomic (HF&E) aspects may be considered, but these tend to be more limited or overlooked. This paper discusses an HF&E framework for forensic analysis, including its four major subdisciplines (micro-, meso-, macro-, and mega-ergonomics), the role each plays throughout the product life cycle, and examines their relationship to known and foreseeable use and misuse of a product or system. A taxonomy of errors, including distinguishing features of individual user errors versus system use errors, is presented and then used in a diagnostic rubric developed for forensic engineers to help identify HF&E issues as part of a forensic analysis. A health care setting case study is offered to demonstrate rubric use, but the rubric is generalizable to other domains.

References

G. Salvendy, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 4th Edition, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, inc., 2012.

S. M. Casey, Set Phasers on Stun: and Other True Tales of Design, Technology and Human Error, 2nd edition, Santa Barbara: Aegean, 1998.

S. M. Casey, The Atomic Chef: and Other True Tales of Design, Technology and Human Error, Santa Barbara: Aegean, 2006.

G. M. Samaras, “Reducing latent errors, drift errors, and stakeholder dissonance,” WORK: A Journal of Assessment, Prevention, and Rehabilitation, 41(s1):1948-1955, 2012., vol. 41, no. s1, pp. 1948-1955, 2012.

E. A. Samaras and G. M. Samaras, “Using Human-Centered Systems Engineering to Reduce Nurse Stakeholder Dissonance,” Biomed Instrum & Technol, vol. 44, no. (s1), pp. 25-32, 2010.

G. M. Samaras, “Human-Centered Systems Engineering: Managing Dissonance in Healthcare Delivery,” in Management Engineering for Effective Healthcare Delivery: Principles and Practices, Kolker, A. & Story, (Eds), Philadelphia, IGI Global, 2011, pp. 148-171.

J. Reason, Human Error, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

S. W. Dekker, Ten Questions about Human Error: A New View of Human Factors and System Safety, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005.

G. M. Samaras, ”Medical Device Life Cycle Risk Management,” ASQ Biomedical Division Biofeedback Newsletter, Volume 43 (2), August 2015.

G. M. Samaras, “Misuse, and Abuse of the Device Failure Modes Effects Analysis,” MD+DI Online, 2013.

G. M. Samaras, “An Approach to Human Factors Validation,” Journal of Validation Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 190-201, 2006.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-25

Versions

How to Cite

Samaras, George, and EA Samaras. 2021. “Ergonomics and Forensic Engineering”. Journal of the National Academy of Forensic Engineers 38 (1). https://doi.org/10.51501/jotnafe.v38i1.102.

Issue

Section

Articles