Lessons Learned from a Forensic Engineering Investigation of a Scaffold Support Failure

Abstract

During use, a scaffold support allegedly failed, causing injuries to the user when he fell. The plaintiff’s expert identified a defective weld as the cause of failure and opined that the product was improperly designed. This paper examines methods used to evaluate the circumstances of and claims made regarding the incident. A combination of engineering methodologies, including metallurgical evaluation, stress analysis, and physical testing, was used to examine the plaintiff’s claims of deficiencies in the design and fabrication of the product. The engineering methodologies refute claims made about the structural capacity of the product by the plaintiff’s expert and the fundamental cause of failure. This paper examines themes related to the presence of apparent defects/failure and the necessity of verifying postulated hypotheses. It also examines the efficacy of analysis and testing as part of implementation of the “forensic engineering method” in verifying or rejecting hypotheses en route to offering expert opinions in forensic engineering investigations.