Forensic Engineering Analysis of Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51501/jotnafe.v43i1.946

Keywords:

Roadway Design, Temporary Traffic Control, Civil Engineering, Forensic Analysis, Civil Design, Work Zone, Construction Zone, Roadway Safety, Signage, AASHTO, Greenbook, MUTCD, Forensic Engineering, Collision Analysis, Litigation, Accident Reconstruction, Road Design, Project Development

Abstract

When evaluating evidence for causative factors contributing to a motor vehicle collision, consideration should be given to roadway geometric or traffic control factors. Roadway geometry, clear zone, safety features, visibility obstructions, and traffic control devices and their placement may influence drivers’ behavior. Are the roadways involved properly designed and signed? The geometric design and traffic control requirements for special circumstances, such as highway construction zones, mixed-use paths, railway crossings, or low traffic volumes, may also present the potential for roadway issues. An evaluation of these potential contributing factors can open a Pandora’s box of opportunities for errors when an improper engineering analysis follows. This paper explores the topics that guide proper engineering analysis of roadway geometry and traffic control, including determining which design standards, policies, or guidelines apply and the proper application of the semantics in these documents. Additionally, this paper addresses recommendations contained in research concepts or reports versus requirements for the designer, the constructor, or the roadway owner. The discussion includes examples from past cases addressing the topics presented, providing a systematic approach to evaluating permanent or temporary roadway geometric or traffic control design for factors contributing to a collision event.

References

Federal Highway Administration, “Transportation Planning and Capacity Building,” U.S. Department of Transportation. [Online]. Available: https://www.planning.dot.gov/mpo/. Accessed: May 2024.

Federal Highway Administration, “Integrating Safety in the Rural Transportation Planning Process,” U.S. Department of Transportation. [Online]. Available: https://highways.dot.gov/safety/local-rural/integrating-safety-rural-transportation-planning-process/10-introduction#footnotes. Accessed: May 2024.

Federal Highway Administration, “About FHWA,” U.S. Department of Transportation. [Online]. Available: https://highways.dot.gov/about/about-fhwa. Accessed: May 2024.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2018.

Federal Highway Administration, “Celebrating a Century of Cooperation,” Public Roads, Sept./Oct. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://highways.dot.gov/public-roads/septemberoctober-2014/celebrating-century-cooperation. Accessed: May 2024.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Roadside Design Guide. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2011.

Federal Highway Administration, “Memorandum: AASHTO Roadside Design Guide, 4th Edition,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Jun. 26, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://highways.dot.gov/safety/rwd/reduce-crash-severity/memorandum-aashto-roadside-design-guide-4th-edition. Accessed: May 2024.

Federal Highway Administration, “MUTCDs & Traffic Control Devices Information by State,” U.S. Department of Transportation. [Online]. Available: https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/state_info/index.htm. Accessed: May 2024.

Michigan Department of Transportation, 2020 Standard Specifications for Construction. Lansing, MI, USA: State of Michigan, 2020.

Federal Highway Administration, “Guidance on NHS Design Standards and Design Exceptions,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Mar. 6, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/design/standards/qa.cfm. Accessed: May 2024.

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Design Manual Part 1X. Harrisburg, PA, USA: State of Pennsylvania, 2023.

M. O’Hagan, “Reluctant towns, cities and states are being dragged into court to fix sidewalks for people with disabilities,” Time, Oct. 12, 2021. [Online].

Federal Highway Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC, USA: FHWA, 2012.

Federal Highway Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC, USA: FHWA, 2000.

Google Earth Pro, imagery dated Jul. 26, 2016. [Online].

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2001.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Roadside Design Guide. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2002.

Google Earth Pro, “Google Earth Pro,” Mar. 6, 2024. [Online].

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, “Publication Detail: Roadside Design Guide, 4th Edition.” [Online]. Available: https://store.transportation.org/Item/PublicationDetail?ID=1802. Accessed: May 2024.

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

McClure, Tim, and Jerry Ogden. 2026. “Forensic Engineering Analysis of Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control”. Journal of the National Academy of Forensic Engineers 43 (1). https://doi.org/10.51501/jotnafe.v43i1.946.