Methodology and Tools for Forensic Engineering Analysis of Electrical Shocks




Electrocution, electrical shock injury, leakage current, resistance, impedance, insulation, stray voltage, electrophysiology, grounded conductor, grounding conductor, electrolyte, ground fault circuit interrupter, GFCI


Forensic engineering analyses of electrical shock incidents are challenging because many factors need to be considered to understand how and why the incident happened. The goal is to determine how and why the victim’s body became part of an electrical circuit that caused the shock injury. To do this, the engineer needs to determine, if possible, all of the connected portions that combined to make the complete circuit at the time of the shock, including the energized and non-energized conductors. Then, failures (defects) of components and violations from standards by parties involved with manufacturing, installing, inspecting, operating, and servicing the electrical circuits/systems involved need to be determined and their relation to the cause (failure-modes) evaluated. There will often be multiple circuits in the vicinity of the shock victim, some of which are pertinent to the shock and others that are not. These circuits need to be analyzed and non-pertinent circuits ruled out. When the pertinent circuit is determined, all the conductive elements and connections that form the (often three-dimensional) circuit should be identified. This paper outlines the scientific methodology and tools, logical decision analyses, and procedures for performing a shock analysis and provides examples based on actual investigations.


E. i. C. Brian Garner, Dictionary, Black's Law, St. Paul, MN: Thompson West, 1999.

M. R. Zemaitis, L. A. Foris, R. A. Lopez and M. R. Huecker., “Electrical Injuries,” StatPearls Publishing LLC., 26 August 2021. [Online]. Available:,year%20that%20are%20non%2Dfatal. [Accessed 22 April 2022].

P. Laura Liptai, “Forensic Engineering and the Scientific Method,” Journal of the National Academy of Forensic Engineers, vol. XXVI, no. June 2009, p. 10, 2009.

NFPA, National Electric Code, NFPA 70, Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 2020.

G. & C. Merriam Co., Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield, MA USA: G. & C. Merriam Co., 1975.

F. W. a. Z. M. W. Sears, University Physics, Fourth Edition, Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Welsley Publishing Co., Inc., 1970.

R. C. Lee, Electrical Trauma, The Patholophysiology, Manifestations and Clinical Management, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

R. D. a. J. Svoboda, Introduction to Electric Circuits, New York, NY USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 4th Edition.

L. A. Geddes, Handbook of Electrical Hazards and Accidents, CRC Press, Inc., 1995.

International Electrotechnical Committee (IEC), “Effects of Current on Human Beings and Livestock IEC TS 60479-1,” International Electrotechnical Committee (IEC), Geneva Switzerland, 2005.

International Association of Electrical Inspectors, Soares Book on Grounding and Bonding 14E, 2020 NEC, Richardson, TX: International Association of Electrical Inspectors, 2020.

J. G. Webster, Medical Instrumentation, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1998.

C. F. , “Electrical Shock Hazard,” IEEE, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 9, 1972.

OSHA (. Administration, “Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) 29 CFR 1910.147,” United States Department of Labor, [Online]. Available: [Accessed 22 April 2022].

OSHA, “Personal Protective Equipment CFR 1910.132,” United States Department of Labor, [Online]. Available: [Accessed 22 April 2022].

D. Norman, “Does High Voltage Testing Damage A Motor?,” Baker Instruments, [Online]. Available: [Accessed 22 April 2022].




How to Cite

Korinek, Chris. 2023. “Methodology and Tools for Forensic Engineering Analysis of Electrical Shocks”. Journal of the National Academy of Forensic Engineers 40 (1).