Forensic Engineering Analysis of the Alleged Failure of an Emergency Vehicle Traffic Light Preemption System
Keywords:forensic engineering, traffic control system, infrared strobe transmission, infrared detection, traffic light preemption, emergency vehicle, traffic light controller, collision avoidance, traffic safety
This case involved a fatal collision between a police vehicle (operated by a police officer) and a non-police vehicle (operated by a civilian). With lights and sirens activated, the officer in pursuit ran a red light and crashed into the civilian’s vehicle in an intersection whose traffic light controller included an emergency vehicle preemption system. The civilian driver was mortally injured, and died the next day. The estate of the deceased driver sued the police officer, municipal police department, and manufacturer of the emergency vehicle preemption system. The author was retained by counsel for the estate of the deceased to assist in the case against the manufacturer of the emergency vehicle preemption system and municipality. The evidence showed that the preemption system was working properly, but that the system’s confirmation lights had been improperly programmed. A maximum speed was calculated at which a preempted green light for emergency drivers would be assured. Event logs in the police vehicle showed that the police officer was driving too fast for the traffic light controller to cycle through its sequence before the officer reached the intersection.
How to Cite
In connection with my efforts as a presenter at any NAFE educational program and/or as an author of a NAFE Journal article, I may have occasion to perform tasks and activities which could be determined to constitute authorship under applicable copyright laws. It is my express intent never to exercise any intellectual property right in any NAFE document or publication, whether in final or draft form. With regard to any intellectual property I provide to NAFE, I hereby warrant that (1) I am the author of such work or that I have secured written consent for use of any portions of the work copyrighted by others and (2) to the best of my knowledge, the work does not violate or infringe the copyright or other personal property rights of others.
I hereby acknowledge that my participation in NAFE activities provides me with substantial and valuable benefits, including access to current and revised forensic engineering content, discussion of existing and emerging legal and forensic principles, concepts and trends, and the opportunity to review forensic engineering information prior to its dissemination to the broader engineering community.
Accordingly, for and in consideration of the foregoing, I hereby bargain, sell and irrevocably assign to the National Academy of Forensic Engineering (NAFE), all of my right, title and interest, property claim, and demand of every kind and nature whatever in any and all copyrights (including full and exclusive worldwide ownership of the copyright, and all of the rights comprised therein, in print and in all other media), under and by virtue of any acts of Congress, with the rights to any and all profits, benefits and advantage that may arise from printing, publishing or sale of printed copies, electronic versions or other media assigned to the NAFE.